Közzétéve:

States Agreement Popular Vote

“Finding” three votes per district in urban areas is not a difficult thing. « . [19] National Popular Vote argues, however, that electoral fraud would be more difficult than under the current system, given that the total number of votes would likely have to be changed: at present, a close ballot can be determined by the outcome in a single “low-point state.” And the margin in this state will likely be much smaller than the national margin, due to the small number of voters at the state level and the fact that several states can have close results. [29] Some opponents of the pact argue that it would result in an increase in the number of third-party candidates, which would allow an election to be won by a majority of only 15% of the vote. Rosenstiel, who describes himself as “a lifetime Republican stuck behind Minnesota`s blue wall,” says national referendum efforts have a lot of support from frustrated voters across the country. NPVIC legislation has been introduced in all 50 Member States. [1] As of November 2020 [Update], the NPVIC has been adopted by fifteen states and the District of Columbia. Together, they have 196 votes, or 36.4% of the Electoral College and 72.6% of the 270 votes needed to give compact legal force. Until July 2020, no Republican governor has signed the NPVIC. “I`ve been interested in the oddities of the Electoral College since the `60s,” Koza said.

Some of us came together and said that perhaps a state approach that we have would be a better way to try to get a national referendum. .