January 1949: The Un ensures a ceasefire between India and Pakistan – also known as the Karachi Agreement – and allows both countries to retain control of the territories detained at the time. No agreement yet on the referendum. Among the PoWs, 195 Pakistani military officers detained in India have been identified as the main war crimes suspects. Pakistan insisted that they be released as one of its main demands. She urged several Muslim countries to refuse recognition of Bangladesh until the release of the 195 officers. [7] India preferred their repatriation to Pakistan. In the text of the agreement, Bangladeshi Foreign Minister Kamal Hossain said that representatives of the Kashmiri government and representatives of the Indian government had reached an agreement to approve the main decisions of the Constituent Assembly of the State J-K. This agreement later became known as the Delhi Agreement, 1952. The main features of this agreement were: allow me, Mr President, to deal now with each of these points, as well as with the agreement that has been reached between the Government of Jammu and Kashmir and the Indian Government on them. The Delhi Agreement was a trilateral agreement signed on 28 August 1973 between India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. and only ratified by India and Pakistan. [1] It allowed the repatriation of prisoners of war and interned officials held in the three countries after Bangladesh`s war of liberation in 1971.
The agreement was criticized because Pakistan did not repatriate Urdu spokesmen to Bangladesh and failed to bring to justice 195 high-ranking military personnel accused of being admitted to the war. [2] Subject to the above provisions, the head of state is appointed for a five-year term from the time he takes office; there was total agreement on the position of the Sadar-i-Riyasat; Although the Sadar-i-Riyasat was chosen by state law, it had to be recognized as such by the Indian president before its installation; In other Indian states, the head of state was appointed by the president and, as such, his candidate, but the person who was to be appointed head had to be an acceptable person to the government of that state; No one who is not acceptable to the government can be pushed on the state as head of state. The difference in the case of Kashmir lies solely in the fact that Sadar-i-Riyasat is elected primarily by the legislative branch of the state itself, instead of being a candidate of the government and the president of India. With regard to the powers and functions of the Sadar-i-Riyasat, the following argument was agreed upon by mutual agreement The Treaty entered into force on 8 August 1973 and ended on 1 July 1974. Under the agreement, UNHCR oversaw the repatriation of citizens from Bangladesh and Pakistan.